|
Welcome to our Cat Forums! | ||||
Welcome to our CatForums! You are seeing this message because you are viewing our cat forums as a guest. You can continue to browse our many cat related areas as a guest but you are more than welcome to register and join our friendly community of Cat Lovers! ... And for free! Doing so will also remove this message and some of the ads, such as the one on the left. Please click here to register. |
|
|||||
|
|||||
Did anybody watch the Whistleblower report on Banks?? It was very good, and can be found here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...tch-video.html Disgusting what some of the banks have been upto, moving money without permission, mis-selling of product etc |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
You can only claim "penalty" charges, i.e. charges for effectively doing something wrong (in the eyes of the bank) so they could be correct that some of the charges are not penalty charges, you should be looking for charges when overdrawn, bouncing cheques, card misuse fees etc. Recheck your details and see if the offer they have given you is correct or not. I think you will be only able to mention the other lady's details if they have got the amount of charges wrong. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Doh!!! Too late, I've written to them today. I've written them a nice letter though, not a threatening one, just asking them to explain their charges etc etc. I have also mentioned the other lady's details and told them that I have lost confidence in them due to this breach of client confidentiality/data protection. I have opened another bank account elsewhere now too, as I think I'm going to leave them now regardless. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Good for you Charlie, they will still have to settle even if they can justify their other charges. It will be interesting to see what they say about the other lady's details. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
New developments recently in relation to reclaiming your charges Natwest Defence Struck out by Reading Court ! Seems as though more and more judges have had enough of the banks constant abuse of the court process. Last month we reported on a number of claims in Lincoln where judges had threatened to strike out bank defences to penalty charge claims. A few days ago a judge at Reading County Court has issued the following order against Natwest Bank; 1. Defence struck out as an abuse of process. 2. Claimant may enter judgement for the outstanding balance of the claim and court fees and interest. There is NO leave for Natwest to set aside,vary or stay the order. Good to read that the courts are now realising what the banks are up to |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
certainly is Fran also members of the consumer action group have had charges prior to 6 years paid out So if any Catsey members get payment for their charges and want to go back further than six years you can do (with the correct advice) you must make sure you do not sign any paperwork from the bank to say that the first claim is in full and final settlement |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
my daughter got a 20 quid charge all because she went 30p into the red!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
|
|||||
|